View
 

Northern Voice Post-Mortem

This version was saved 18 years, 2 months ago View current version     Page history
Saved by PBworks
on February 23, 2008 at 5:31:38 pm
 

 

Boris Mann hosted an informal Northern Voice Post-Mortem Saturday afternoon to get feedback for next year’s

 

(Blame Tod for the typos. I can't type fast.)

 

 

The Wiki

  • Maybe we need a wiki host? -- someone responsible for the wiki, like how Rebecca live-blogs (unofficially and generously).
  • Is it the most efficient way to do registrations?
  • There should be a screen-cast on how to use the wiki
  • Why are there TWO SITES?! (wiki and main site)
  • Wiki can be intimidating to newcomers?
  • Should we have an email list to promote the next (un-)conference? Non-bloggers probably won't follow the blogs or subscribe to the Moosecamp RSS feed.

 

Registration

  • People want a single sign-up (not just one for the dinner, one for each day, blah blah...)

 

Human Graphing

  • Could have been publicized better
  • Maybe shouldn't have been done first thing in the morning?

 

Day One: BootCamp 101

  • Necessary to have - a lot of people are new and could be intimidated from Day Two.
  • Some BootCamp presenters seemed to just be "winging it" -- more work on the presentations needed
  • Podcasting 101 could have had more practical how-to content (e.g., how to use the Libsyn interface, etc.)
    • A "walk-through" isn't necessary per se, but at least some discussion on practicalities
  • Presenters should use the wiki more/better
  • "What's Next" presentation didn't really talk about what was next, but the topic that emerged was okay with everyone
  • Should we develop a ratings-system for expertise level? Seemed to be very different levels in the audiences.
    • Beginners/"Newbies": Dunce Cap?
    • Intermediate/"Normies": Star?
    • Advanced: "Alpha Nerds": Propeller Hat?
    • A "jargon-meter"?
  • But, shouldn't apply to everything, especially those where breaking up the group into expertise levels might mean there'd only be a handful of each
  • Do we even NEED a BootCamp? Does it mean the conference is inaccessible and therefore needs a bootcamp?

 

 

Schedule

  • Need to do a better job 'splaining the sessions (more descriptive abstracts)
  • How are our day-to-day life culturally impacted by all this?
  • Titles and abstracts often sound too generic or acedemic.
  • with Moosecamp, we were actually pretty light on sessions this year, and we could work on the scheduling/slotting process. There were a few that would really have benefitted from longer sessions, some that flowed naturally from each other and some that either needed bigger or smaller rooms.
  • Maybe a few more minutes between sessions, there wasn't enough time to say a quick word to the leader/speaker and also get into the next session on time (mostly re: MooseCamp/Bootcamp)

 

Steering Committee

  • We don't have anyone representing the "newbie" delegates... committee is all aplha-nerds
  • it might be nice to have a bit of rotation of committee members to give some other folks a chance too

 

 

Random Comments 

  • "Sheriffs" a cool idea
  • We should have a place where people can answer questions from newcomers in advance of the event (on the wiki?)
  • Food was AWESOME! Thanks for providing the yummy lunches, it gave all of us that much more time together to talk.

 

 

Comments (0)

You don't have permission to comment on this page.